¿21st century education?


Rosa María Torres
 
(updated: 27 June, 2021)





Everyone talks about 'Education in the 21st Century':

- 21st century skills
- 21st century students
- 21st century educators
- 21st century schools
- 21st century classrooms

Strictly speaking, however, there is no 'Education in the 21st Century'.

What 21st century?
- About 1 in 4 people live in multidimensional poverty or are vulnerable to it.
- More than 40% of the global population does not have any social protection.
- 840 million people live without electricity.

- Over one thousand million people has no drinking water and 2 in 5 people have no facilities for hand-washing. 
- 43% of schools have no facilities to wash hands with water and soap (UNICEF, 2019)
- 6.5 billion people – 85.5% of the global population – don’t have access to reliable broadband internet.
Source: UN/UNDP 2020

The 21st century is not the same for everyone.

Millions of people do not enjoy the benefits of modernity and comfort, do not have running water, toilets, electricity, decent work and housing, reading and writing, good education opportunities, basic services and basic citizenship rights.

Inequalities - within each country, between countries, between the global North and the global South - become structural: extreme poverty and extreme wealth, hyper-consumption and misery, overinformation for some and zero information for others, the illiterate and the overqualified, the connected and the disconnected.

Home-based virtual education, recommended while schools were closed because of the covit-19 pandemic and confinement, remains out of reach for half of the world's population who lack access to the Internet.

Evidently, life in the 21st century is very different for those living with less than 1 or 2 dollars a day (those living in extreme poverty) and for those participating fully in the Information Society, the Knowledge Society, the Learning Society, the Digital Society.

What education?

There is no education in singular, as a universal fact and as a homogeneous experience for all. There are educations, in plural, diverse in nature, purposes and qualities, because realities, cultures, ideologies, aspirations and needs of concrete social groups are diverse. And because education is not confined to the education system; there is education in the family, in the community, at the workplace, through the media, the arts, participation, social service, etc.

Education and learning needs and experiences are shaped by specific economic, social and cultural contexts and conditions. Community, family and school education models developed historically by indigenous populations, many of which are alive in many countries, coexisting with the dominant Western models, are not only different education models; they are alternative knowledge systems.

Education in the 21st century? 

Education in the 21st century is diverse, placed historically in this century and geographically in each specific context, and does not necessarily correspond to the '21st century' vision coming from the 'developed world'.

Millions of children, youth and adults have never used a computer and don't know what can be found behind a screen. Millions of children and youth don't know where food comes from, how to grow a potato, a lemmon, a tomato. Different types of ignorance.

21st century skills?

Skills needed are different or have different priorities for different people in different places, cultures and circumstances. Lists of "21st century skills" circulated by international organizations are generally conceived and proposed from the North, mainly for urban realities. Several skills grouped today as "21st century skills" were previously presented as "20th century skills".

Children, young people and adults living in poverty - the majority of the world population - develop skills than enable them to survive in very difficult circumstances and to become resilient at an early age. They learn to take care of themselves and their families, to cooperate with others, to solve practical problems, and to learn in all circumstances.

There are several lists of "21st century skills" proposed by international actors such as the European Commission (key competences for lifelong learning in European schools), the World Economic Forum (job skills for the future), OECD (learning for life), UNICEF (transferable skills), and the InterAmerican Development Bank (skills for life).

The pandemic revealed the real magnitude of economic, social, educational and digital inequalities throughout the world and in each particular country, and the need to radically rethink education and learning systems and practices: what, where, when and how do children, young people and adults, families and communities need to learn if we are to ensure the right to education, that is, the right to educational inclusion, equity and quality for all.

Related texts in this blog (English)
» Basic Learning Needs: Different Frameworks
 

5 comentarios:

Cristina Milos dijo...

Hi Rose,

I think you are one of the teachers that hits the target but misses the point.
In as much as you accurately describe the gaps between the "abundance" vs. "poor" societies you are wrong in understanding that 21st century skills and values have changed.
You do not need technology to enable students COLLABORATE on long-term projects or during a simple lesson.
You do not need technology to let them OWN their learning.
You do not need tech tools to let them CONSTRUCT meaning in their own way and differentiate tasks.
You do not need technology to let them SHARE their learning to authentic audiences - other students and local community.
Because most of the 21st century values are based on BRAIN and EDUCATION research: how kids learn best. LEARNING is the purpose while TECHNOLOGY is just a tool...

Rosa María Torres del Castillo dijo...

Hi!
Are you sure you are commenting on this post? Technologies are not even mentioned here!
I understand your comment is in fact related to our brief Twitter exchange. You circulated "The 21 Things That Will Become Obsolete in Education by 2020" http://t.co/NVe0IPD and I asked you: "Obsolete, where?" While including a link to this post, I added (two consecutive tweets): "It cannot be generalized. We must admit diversity. The world is a highly heterogeneous and inequitable place. No one-size fits all". Which is precisely what this post talks about.
With regards to brain and learning issues: as we know now from Neroscience research, not even human brains are the same and develop in the same way. Gender, age, economic, social and cultural aspects shape the brain (and influence learning) in the most varied ways.
Regards,
Rosa Maria Torres

Estela Ripa dijo...

Hola Rosa María,

Recién leo tu post y una vez más me siento plenamente expresada en lo que escribes. Creo que detrás de mucho de lo que se dice para caracterizar la época en que vivimos hay una presunción de homogeneidad desconcertante.

Lamentablemente, a mi juicio, los discursos más visibles son los que adhieren a esa visión unificada y tecnologizada de presente y futuro, desde una perspectiva más entusiasta e ilusionada que crítica y prudente. Con lo cual se da la espalda a una de las sombras más reales de nuestra época, que es el reconocimiento del no saber y la incertidumbre.

Así, a veces pienso que la heterogeneidad real del mundo – me refiero a la que no compromete los derechos humanos básicos- de alguna manera puede ser también una "reserva" frente a la influencia del tipo de vida hiper tecnologizado, consumista, etc. que estamos viviendo y del cual no podemos anticipar ni controlar plenamente sus consecuencias. Usando una analogía científica, podríamos imaginar que es un gran experimento en el cual nos vemos asignados más o menos voluntaria o forzadamente a grupos experimentales y grupos control. Dado que no conocemos el impacto de las consecuencias, ni su reversibilidad, hay un aspecto bueno en el hecho de que haya partes de la población que no sean sometidas al “tratamiento”.

Un cordial saludo, Estela

David Truss dijo...

For me, when I see '21st Century Education', and similar terms, I think not of a singularity, nor does my mind go to places where subsistance is the primary concerns of people... though I do think a global perspective is key to a good education today. What I do think about are the skills my daughters will need to be successful. I think of how Google has shifted the value of information. At one point kings and rulers and religous organizations owned or controled the flow of information and thus power, and eventually they began to educate the children of the elite. Rather spending time weaving this history to today, I'll just use as an example that now my daughter can get information any time she wants, but finding good and relevant and accurate information can be a challenge. Searching the web for relevant information has become a 21st century competency - a challenge that did not previously exist. (If you think back to the 1990's most websites were corporate and informational, now that is not the dominant use of the web.)
Relevant to this, I agree with you that 'diverse are the realities, cultures, ideologies, and aspirations of concrete social sectors and groups.' And yet we are learning how a revolt in the Middle East can have far reaching implications and I can see that cultures (and languages) are sadly disappearing.
To contextualize my own idea of "education for the 21st century", this to me is a transformation from doing things because "that's the way we've always done it", into an education that is responsive and thinking-based (as opposed to information-based). So, in my humble opinion, there is an "EDUCATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY" in that what we currently do must shift or transform from what we used to do... and if we do not recognize the need to change what we do, then we face the risk of having the 21st Century Learning debate into the next decade.
~Thanks for this thoughtful post!
Dave.

Rosa Maria Torres dijo...

Dave: Thanks for your comment. When talking of "21st century", you think of your daughters, as you say, and on what would be best for them. I think of the inequities of the world, of the majority of the population, the poor and the "disadvantaged", most of them living in so-called "developing countries" like mine. "Global perspective" and "global awareness" mean thus different things for you and me, and have very different implications.
Rosa Maria

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...